Receive our Blogs via email

Your email:

Follow Me

KnowledgeCircles Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

When Stocks Decline in Market Value

  
  
  

Stock market values“…So when at times the mob is swayed
To carry praise or blame too far,
We may choose something like a star
To stay our minds on and be staid”
        - Robert Frost “Something Like a Star”

Keep in mind, as you read this, a very important distinction: the distinction between a company’s market value, as opposed to it’s true, intrinsic value. 

In today’s fast paced world, dominated by “efficient markets” and the near instantaneous delivery of information, it seems to me that there are more emotional and psychological factors that affect market movements than the cumulative effect of either improving or deteriorating factors that cause changes in the intrinsic value of particular companies.

There are any number of reasons that might explain the decline in market value of a particular company; here are a few of the most prominent: 

  1. The company is swept up in a general market decline, as in the recent financial and credit crisis, and what is happening now (late July – early August, 2011), which is a combination of the US fiscal situation and negative economic news that has some economic forecasters giving probability to a double-dip recession).  In this instance, otherwise good companies get “swept up” in the emotional elements that often drive the market, in contrast to the staid and unchanged fundamentals of the particular company itself. 
  2. The company is caught up in “out of favor” sentiment for particular industry segments.  This has to do with those companies that operate in cyclical industries or those who operate in industry segments that may temporarily be in “out of favor”; (think large money-center banks which were at the center of the financial and credit crisis, and still today are lagging, having not returned to pre-crisis levels nearly 4 years after the events and whose share of the S&P500 has shrunk dramatically).
  3.  A change having to do with “analyst expectations”.  We see this most often in the publicized affect of a company “missing earnings expectations” (negative); or “beating earnings estimates”, (positive). Generally, after these announcements there can be significant price swings that largely dissolve in short order.
  4. A change in market value for a company having to do with either a “negative”/”positive” circumstance which is particular to the company (for example, when a Best Buy misses same store sales growth, a perceived “negative”; or when Apple sells more iPad's than was “expected”, a “positive”).
  5.  A change in the earning power, or financial structure of a company, which affects the intrinsic value of a company; or when an investor has misjudged intrinsic value on the buy, and the market, over time, adjusts the market value to the lower intrinsic value assessment.

As an investor, which of the above is the more troubling? 

Granted, the changes in market value having to do with any of the items #1-4, can be cause for the investor to indulge in large doses of alka-seltzer, for sure. However, most companies that have been in existence for a long time period, will have suffered declines in market value for any one of the 4 reasons cited in items #1-4 above, without ever affecting intrinsic value. Good, resilient companies with provable business models, and track records, more often than not recover from any of these, albeit, depending on the DNA of the company, at differing recovery rates.

The long-term history of the market is that even what at the time seems like a “new normal” and there are large, significant changes in market value, (most recently, recessions, the tech bubble, the financial and credit crisis), these all appear as mere blips when viewed in the context of greater time.  But no doubt, living it causes us to believe that we are in for a seminal change, when in fact it is very much like getting caught up in a terrible storm that seemingly lasts forever, and all of the angst prior to the storm hitting, then experiencing living through it, only to see that after a while there is indeed a return to calm, blue skies.

The macro events of today, the several trading days of negative market value changes and the effects of the possibility of a double-dip recession and the continuing fiscal status of the U.S., should all be viewed in the context of the immediately preceding paragraph.

However, it is the change in market value deriving from item #5, that one should most concern oneself with, (assuming that you are not forced to sell into the dips in the market).  Changes in intrinsic value and/or the miscalculation of intrinsic value at purchase represent the real risk of investing in equities.  If, on the other hand, you own good companies, and have correctly assessed their quality and intrinsic value, and have purchased at a price below the intrinsic value which affords a “margin of safety”, then the temporal affects of changes in market value which are macro and even perhaps extraneous, are just something that we have to endure as we move toward the market realization of the true value of the company.

The takeaway from this: The important characteristic of “expanding intrinsic value” that some companies possess, is alive and well, despite Mr. Market’s tantrums and personality defects.  If you own good companies and are assured of their quality and financial strength, then hold on and try not to fret too much over the daily price changes of the stock indexes, even though the variability might persist for an uncomfortable time period.  And try to do as Frost admonishes, above, “choose something like a star, and be staid.”

Michael Kindred is a former CFO and board member of a public company with a degree in economics and finance.  He has held various positions with major financial institutions and investment partnerships. He is developing the soon to be available website http://www.knownothinginvestor.com. The site is being developed as a resource for individual investors to help them identify financially strong (weak) companies. He also consults with small business owners to create long-term sustainable value for their companies, which enables the enhancement of the personal net worth for them and their families.  Michael's email is knownothinginvestor@gmail.com

 

Comments

In my opinion, there are only two ways to look at the stock market. The first is fundamentally and the second is technically.  
 
 
 
Fundamental analysis is simply looking at things that we all look at every day like balance sheets, income statements, sales reports, cash flows, etc. This will tell you all about the individual company's financial performance. 
 
 
 
The second thing to look at is the technical information about a company’s (or a market's) trading patterns. High, low, close charts and point and figure charts are examples of tools for technical analysis. Just like learning to read fundamental reports, charts for technical analysis take some time to learn to read and then apply that knowledge in the real world. Technical analysis allows one to look into the emotional drivers of companies and markets because they allow a glimpse into hearts of the people who are buying and selling a particular stock, because in spite of what people are saying these charts show when people bought and when the sold. These charts are also available for almost any major market index as well. Being able to visually understand what has actually been bought or sold is very helpful in understanding where a market or stock might go in the future. 
 
 
 
If a stock has really strong fundamentals (strong earnings etc) and the price is cheap, a quick look at a long term chart might be able to help one figure out why the market is not embracing that particular company. As noted in the article, it may be a bad time for the industry that company is associated with or maybe it is even something that is less obvious. The charts will help you flesh that out. 
 
 
 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a great example of the yin and yang of studying the markets. As of today (Aug 6) the markets have been very bad for the last several trading days. Fundamentally the markets are actually in pretty good shape. Generally earnings are strong and the price for stocks in the DJIA 30 are relatively cheap (about 10 times earnings before the latest declines). Fundamentally, the market should be doing well. A look at the charts reveals a very weak and troubled market however. This is where technical analysis can be very helpful to the average investor. 
 
 
 
All that said, there is no easy to gauge future performance of a stock, a bond, mutual fund or market index. If there was a sure fire way to do this, everyone would be rich. It is a lot like fishing. If you know what flies to use on a certain stream, and where to cast, you can increase your chances of success. The financial markets are much the same. Experience can be a cruel teacher, but it is the only way to learn these lessons. 
 
 
 
There are a number of books that have been written on how to do technical analysis over the years. Go out to your favorite business book store or web site and see what you can dig up.
Posted @ Saturday, August 06, 2011 4:59 PM by Scott Thorson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics